Goyal is the best choice to represent
area:
Tuesday, October 22, 2006
Mansfield
News Journal
The Issue:
Democrat Jay Goyal and Republican
Phil Holloway are running against each for a 73rd Ohio House district
seat.
Our Opinion:
Both are qualified to succeed state
Rep. Bill Hartnett. Holloway can't be expected to "restore trust" when
he supports campaign ads that are flatly false. Vote Goyal.
Voters
in the 73rd Ohio House district, which includes Mansfield and most
of Richland County, have a choice between two qualified candidates.
Democrat
Jay Goyal and Republican Phil Holloway each offer a thorough understanding
of key issues and a sincere dedication to serving the best interests
of area residents.
Goyal, 26, is an engineer and vice president of
Goyal Industries, his family's business. He worked hard to win the
Democratic primary in May and has, he said, "knocked on 10,000 doors" to
meet voters.
Holloway. 59, has amassed a wealth of experience during
24 years as an aide to U.S. Rep. Michael Oxley, R-Findlay, and previously
as a Mansfield City Council member.
Two good men with a sincere desire
to serve.
That said, we endorse Goyal to succeed state Rep. Bill Hartnett.
The legislature needs new ideas and fresh approaches to solving
problems and we believe Goyal will contribute to them.
Holloway, whose
campaign theme is "Restoring hope, restoring trust," has
emphasized his opposition to any tax increase. Responding to a
questionnaire from the National Federation of Independent Business-Ohio,
which asked which of 12 options the candidates might consider to
balance the state budget, Holloway said he checked only one: cutting
spending.
Goyal has acknowledged that he checked three possible options:
cutting spending, raising the sales tax or broadening the base
of the sales tax. During a joint News Journal interview with Holloway
on Oct. 13, Goyal said the only way he would ever support a sales
tax increase would be if there were an overriding, demonstrated
need to designate it for a specific purpose. Like a city "pothole
tax," he said.
We reject Holloway's political ads, which attempt to
alarm voters that Goyal has a tax "plan" that could expand the sales tax to
prescription drugs, gasoline and school lunches. That's a misleading
stretch of Goyal's questionnaire responses. Goyal has denied any
such "plan" and said any suggestion he would support a sales tax
on prescription drugs, gasoline or school lunches is absurd.
Holloway,
who acknowledges that he approved the ads by the Ohio Republi-
can Party in advance, contends they are accurate.
We don't agree.
The ads are a scare tactic not based on fact. Holloway has many good
qualities, but we would have expected better from him, based on his
stated commitment to "restoring trust."
We think district residents
will see through this desperate effort and we urge voters to elect
Goyal on Nov. 7.
|